Posts Refine Structures
Post
Cancel

Refine Structures

Restating question

Before using the potential energy functions to determine the best structure for two candidate structures given the sequence, one has to refine the structures:

  • If one of the structures is the correct one:
    • Need to determine side chain conformations before calculating potential
  • If better structure is only approximate:
    • Need to refine backbone and side chains first

Methods for Refining Structures

  • Energy minization
    • Move towards the local conformation
    • Fast compared the other two
    • restricted to local changes
  • Molecular dynamics
    • tries to simulate the biological process
    • Computationally very intensive
  • Simulated annealing
    • tries to shortcut the route to some of those global free energy minima by raising the temperature and sample all the space, and then cooling down so we trap a high probility conformation

Energy Minization

Gradient Descent

one dimension:

\[\begin{aligned} x_{i}=x_{i-1}-\varepsilon f'(x_{i-1}) \end{aligned}\]

N dimensions:

\[\begin{aligned} \vec{x}_{1}=\vec{x}_{0}-\varepsilon\nabla U_{0}(\vec{x}_{0}) \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned} \nabla U=\left(\cfrac{\partial U}{\partial x_{1}},\ldots,\cfrac{\partial U}{\partial x_{n}}\right) \end{aligned}\]

Force:

\[\begin{aligned} F=-\nabla U \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned} \vec{x}_{1}=\vec{x}_{0}+\varepsilon F_{0}(\vec{x}_{0}) \end{aligned}\]

each step is moving in the direction of the force

Not guaranteed to get to the correct energetic structure

Molecular Dynamics

  • Seeks to simulate the motion of molecules
  • Can escape local minima
\[x(t_i)=x(t_{i-1})+v(t_{i-1})\times(t_i-t_{i-1})\] \[v(t_i)=v(t_{i-1})+\cfrac{F(t_{i-1})}{m}\times(t_i-t_{i-1})\] \[v(t_i)=v(t_{i-1})-\cfrac{\nabla U(t_{i-1})}{m}\times(t_i-t_{i-1})\]

Short simulations take tremendous computing resources

Length of simulation and protocol determine radius of convergence

Simulated Annealing

  • At low temperature we cannot escape local minima
  • At high temperature the kinetic energy exceeds the potential energy barrier
  • This approach allows us to balance the need for speed and the need to be at high temperature

Step

  • Start at high temperature
  • Find most probable states
  • Reduce temperature to trap these states

Metropolis Algorithm

  • Goal: efficiently search a large conformation space
  • Can be understood in terms of physical processes, but much more general
  • Note the difference from molecular dtnamics:
    • Molecules move under physical forces but temperatures are far outside of normal range
    • A sampling method(a search strategy) not a simulation

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Randomly choose neighboring state
    • Always accept moves that reduce potential
    • Go uphill (higher potential) based on odds ratio
\[\cfrac{P(S_{\text{test}})}{P(S_{n})}=\cfrac{e^{-E_{\text{test}}/\text{kT}}}{Z(T)}/\cfrac{e^{-E_{n}/\text{kT}}}{Z(T)}=e^{-(E_{\text{test}}-E_{n})/\text{kT}}\]

Boltzmann equation

Full Algorithm

Iterate for a fixed number of cycles or until convergence:

  1. Start with a system in state $S_n$ with energy $E_n$
  2. Choose a neighboring state at random; we will call it the proposed state: $S_{\text{test}}$ with energy $E_{\text{test}}$
  3. If $E_{\text{test}}\lt E_{n}$: $S_{n+1}=S_{\text{test}}$
  4. Else set $S_{n+1}=S_{test}$ with probalility $P=e^{-(E_{\text{test}}-E_{n})/\text{kT}}$
    • otherwise $S_{n+1}=S_{n}$

Noted that if $kT$ is very high, we almost always take the new state (higher potential). And this is what allows us to climb those energetic hills.

Full Algorithm (prob. version)

To identify minima given a probability function: $P(S)$

  1. Start with a system in state $S_n$
  2. Choose a neighboring state at random: $S_{\text{test}}$
  3. Compute acceptance ratio $a=\cfrac{P(S_{\text{test}})}{P(S_n)}$
  4. If $a\gt 1$: $S_{n+1}=S_{\text{test}}$
  5. Else set $S_{n+1}=S_{\text{test}}$ with probability $a$ and $S_{n+1}=S_{n}$ with probability $1-a$

Not specific to protein structure. Used to sample diverse probability distributions.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.